Protests 917421-G of Emy
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Alaska Fish Oil Extractors, Inc. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1960)
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1945)
- Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1941)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The evidence showed that the merchandise consists of oil extracted from the livers of swordfish and tuna fish by grinding, adding a caustic solution, agitating the mass and allowing it to remain overnight, adding hot water, and centrifuging the mixture which mechanically separates the oil, water, and solids from one another. They are blended with other fish liver oils, put into capsules, and sold for medicinal use. The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was sustained on the authority of Andrews v. United States (T. D. 49190).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.