Protests 165068-G of Matthew MacCarthy, Inc.

Opinion by

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Alengon laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Caesar (18 C. C. P. A. 106, T. D. 44067), filet lace articles like those passed on in United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065), and embroidered wearing apparel similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.