Protest 838443-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.
Protest 838443-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co.
5 Cust. Ct. 417
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware the same as that passed upon in Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.