Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
This appeal to reappraisement involves the proper dutiable value of certain Christmas-tree ornaments exported from Germany and imported at the port of San Francisco, Calif.
The case has been submitted for decision on a stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties, wherein it is agreed, in substance, as follows:
(1) That the Christmas-tree ornaments in question were exported from Germany during the period from January, 1938, through December, 1938.
(2) That the instant merchandise is similar in all material respects to that which was the subject of the decision in the case of F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States (Reap. Dec. 5094).
(3) That the market conditions existing during the period of exportation of the articles in question were similar, if not identical, to the conditions found to be prevailing in the foreign market as described in the Woolworth Co. case, supra.
(4) That the record in the Woolworth Co. case, supra, may be incorporated in and made a part of the record in the present case.
On the agreed facts, as hereinabove set forth, I find that on the dates of exportation of the instant merchandise Christmas-tree orna
Accordingly, I hold as matter of law that the proper dutiable-foreign and export values of the Christmas-tree ornaments in question are the per se unit invoice prices, plus 3 % per centum social assessments, plus packing and cost of cases as invoiced, and plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, as invoiced, whenever reported as dutiable by the appraiser.
The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that éxtent the appeal is hereby dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.