Protest 30432-K of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United States (Court of Customs and Patent Appeals 1973)
- Hurricane Import Co. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In view of stipulation of counsel and from an examination of the illustration attached thereto it appears that the articles, in question consist of a hand gear ship’s wheel mounted on a binnacle stand, and that it is obvious that the addition of a glass top makes the articles suitable for use as tables, but that no glass tops were imported with them. The court was satisfied that the articles are partly finished tables rather than parts of tables and therefore fall within the provision of the trade agreement, and that the greater part by far of the table to be finished is incorporated in each of the imported articles, namely, the binnacle stand and the wheel, and the only part lacking is the glass top. The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 412 and T. D. 49753 was therefore sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.