C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States
Opinion of the Court
This appeal for reappraisement was originally decided in the case of C. J. Tower & Sons et al. v. United States, Reap. Dec. 6171. A timely rehearing motion, filed by counsel for the plaintiff, was granted.
I therefore find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the stipulated and agreed upon values as follows:
Invoice description of tree sizes per bundle Canadian dollars, per bundle of trees
2-3'. . 5083
3-4'. . 5083
5-6'_ . 4857
7-8'. .4750
9-10'. . 5171
12'__ . 4658
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.