Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1967)
- Prepac, Inc. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1959)
- J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1952)
- Quong Hing v. United States (United States Customs Court 1950)
- J. Jolles Studios, Inc. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1950)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
At the trial a Government chemist testified that he found the sample to be composed of a synthetic phenolic resin, colored with a small amount of white pigment, and that in his opinion the synthetic phenolic resin was not a binding agent in the article. The case was submitted for decision, counsel for the plaintiff citing Abstract 49907. Following Abstract 50728, it was held that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.