Uges v. United States
Opinion of the Court
This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the duty assessed on certain cheese at the rate of 7 cents per pound, but not less than 35 per centum ad valorem,under paragraph 710of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is Gouda cheese, dutiable at 5 cents per pound, but not less than 25 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 710, as modified by the trade agreement with the Netherlands, T. D. 48075.
The pertinent parts of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the said trade agreement are as follows:
Pab. 710. [Tariff Act of 1930] Cheese and substitutes therefor, 7 cents per pound, but not less than 35 per centum ad valorem.
Par. 710. [Trade Agreement with the Netherlands] Edam and Gouda cheese, 5 ji per lb., but not less than 25% ad val.
The merchandise is described in the invoices as Gouda cheese, spiced. Dirk Uges, the plaintiff herein, described the process of
The witness also testified that there is a difference in flavoring between Gouda and Spiced Gouda cheese; that Gouda cheese might be acceptable- to some people, but the flavor of Spiced Gouda might not; that if he ordered Gouda cheese, he would not accept Spiced Gouda cheese; that when he wanted Spiced Gouda, he would have to order it by name; that Spiced Gouda cheese has a little tougher texture than regular Gouda; that the moisture content and the appearance of the two are about the same.
The only question involved is whether Spiced Gouda cheese may be classified as Gouda cheese under the trade agreement with the Netherlands. A similar question was before the court in Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp. v. United States, 10 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 767, which involved the classification of Trauben-Swiss brand of Grilyére process-cheese which was flavored with Neuchatel wine. The trade agreement with Finland provided for a lower rate of duty on Gruyére process-cheese. The court held that Gruyére process-cheese covered a class of merchandise made from Swiss cheese by a process of melting such cheese and adding other products to produce the texture and flavor desired and that it included cheese so produced, whether or not it was flavored. The court also stated that it was not impressed with the contention that since orders for Gruyére process-cheese, without other qualification would be .filled with unflavored cheese, the only cheese of that description covered by the trade agreement was the unflavored variety, holding that the merchandise was one of the classes of Gruyére process-cheese, particular varieties being ordered under the brand name desired.
In the instant case, it appears that Gouda and Spiced Gouda cheese are made by the same process and that the only difference between them is in the addition of cumin seeds to flavor the Spiced Gouda. It is, therefore, one of the classes of Gouda cheese and is covered by the provision in the trade agreement. The protests are
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.