Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States
Tientsin Trading Corp. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 134; 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1044
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
At the trial counsel for the plaintiff established by the testimony of a qualified witness that the hats in question are similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in Caradine Hat Co. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.