Dmitrovsky v. United States
Dmitrovsky v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 347; 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 747
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “M” consists of moufflons the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Abstract 57768 and that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same as those involved in Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Dissenting Opinion
dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra, only so far as the items marked “A” are concerned.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.