United States v. Morse
Opinion of the Court
Appellant filed a motion for rehearing in this proceeding, and its supplemental memorandum in support thereof discusses certain phases of the record pertaining to statutory export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930. In connection therewith, particular reference is made to the Treasury representative’s reports (exhibits 2, 4, and 5, and collective exhibits 3, 6, and 7) which show- — and the evidence contained therein is sufficient to establish as matter of fact- — that while at the time of purchase of the present merchandise the price for export to the United States was £6/10/6 per crate, such export price, at the time of exportation of the merchandise, had advanced to £7/3/6 per crate. The factual situation set forth in appellant’s supplemental memorandum is agreed to in ap-pellee’s brief in response thereto, wherein the concurrence by counsel for appellees is stated in the following language:
Appellant has correctly pointed out that although the sheathing felt herein was purchased on March 7, 1945, its exportation was delayed until June 14, 1945; and that during the period of this delay the export value advanced from £6/10/6 per crate to £7/3/6, less nondutiable charges.
Amended judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.