Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States
Calif-Asia Rattan Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 275
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.