Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Albert Dickinson Co. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1957)
- Stanford Seed Co. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1957)
- Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States (United States Customs Court 1957)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Dissenting Opinion
dissented, holding: “I do not concur in the decision in Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462, the record of which has been incorporated in the record of this case. In my opinion, the protest should be overruled.”
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.