United States Customs Court, 1956

Penson & Co. v. United States

Penson & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court · Decided June 27, 1956 · Lawkence
37 Cust. Ct. 464
Penson & Co. v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Lawkence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party when the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing.

Rule 6 (a) of the rules of this court provides that—

* * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

In conformity with the requirements of the rule, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.