Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. v. United States

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. I). 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.

Opinion by

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Rung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266. C. D. 14801 or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.