Gitelman v. United States

Opinion by

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those *347the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin. plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim forfree entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1802, supra.