Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc. v. United States
Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 347
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Dissenting Opinion
dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.