Gutfur, Inc. v. United States

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, supra.

Opinion by

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lamb*357skin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry-under paragraph 1681 was sustained, except as to merchandise invoiced as “domestic cat plates” on the invoice accompanying entry 7768, covered by protest 101913-K, which was abandoned.