Masson v. United States
Masson v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 432
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Sehippach Pencil Olay,” not a ball clay, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Joseph Dixon Crucible Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 157, C. D. 1816), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.