Modlin v. United States
Modlin v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 320
Dissenting Opinion
dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, supra.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.