E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 517
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.