Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States
Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 340
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste composed of synthetic materials, not eo nomine specified in the tariff act, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinbeg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.