Gimbel Bros. v. United States
Gimbel Bros. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 907; 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1496
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of rotary lawn sprinklers similar in all material respects to those the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.