Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States
Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 907; 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1497
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts essential to and dedicated to use with bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.