Florn Co. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
The merchandise involved in this protest consists of so-called perpetual calendars, which were classified by the collector of customs as household utensils, not specially provided for, plated with gold, pursuant to paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem.
It is plaintiff’s contention that said merchandise should be dutiable as household utensils, not specially provided for, composed in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, at the rate of 1214 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to said paragraph 339, as modified, supra, plus the copper tax as assessed by the collector.
This protest has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto to the effect that: The merchandise, assessed as above and represented by the items marked “A” and initialed MMG, by Examiner Max M. Greenberg, on the invoice accompanying the entry covered by this protest consists of
The record in the cited case has been incorporated herein.
Based upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, we hold the merchandise here in question, identified by invoice items marked and initialed as aforesaid, to be dutiable as household utensils, not specially provided for, in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, under the provisions of paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of-1930, as modified by said sixth protocol, at the rate of 12y2 per centum ad valorem. The specified claim to the extent indicated is sustained. All other claims are, however, overruled.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.