Metropolitan Industries, Inc. v. United States
Metropolitan Industries, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 807; 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1369
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise covered by the foregoing protests, described as sprinklers, are, in fact, hose nozzles and following the rationale of United States v. Lipman’s (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.