Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States
Bloomingdale Bros. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 817
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric coffee grinders, having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, without which the articles will not operate, and that the issues involved are analogous to those in Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202) and United States v. Electrolux Corporation (46 CCPA 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.