Ross Products, Inc. v. United States
Ross Products, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 826; 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1282
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of iron wall ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 2289), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.