Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States
Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 129; 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2540
Opinion of the Court
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It apearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.