Gimbel Bros. v. United States
Gimbel Bros. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 865; 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1972
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.