Belf & Lustig, Inc. v. United States
Belf & Lustig, Inc. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 875; 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1915
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.