Smith Wolff Co. v. United States
Smith Wolff Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 879; 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1901
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mer-; chandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.