A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States
A. L. Liebman & Son, Inc. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 868; 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1779
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cabinet locks, not of cylinder or pin tumbler construction, similar in construction to the cabinet locks which were the subject of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.