American Roland Corp. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of thiamine hydrochloride, which merchandise was the subject of American Roland Corp. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 391, Reap. Dec. 10808), wherein the court found, based on facts agreed to by the Government, that the date of exportation of said merchandise covered by the involved entry (856931 of 11/20/62) was during the period November 9, 1962, to May 17,1963; that, in liquidation, the liquidating officer used a date of exportation other than that previously determined by the Government, resulting in a liquidation at a higher dutiable value than that determined by the court in Reap. Dec. 10808, supra; that a request for relief under the provisions of section 520(c) (1), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to correct the inadvertence was denied and the protest herein was lodged against said denial; and that the proper duti
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.