Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
The merchandise of these consolidated protests consists of cameras and cases exported in cardboard boxes from Japan and entered at Los Angeles, California. The question at bar concerns the propriety of a 10 percent additional marking duty which was assessed against the involved importations on the ground that the importer failed to comply with the marking requirements of 19 U.S.C.A., section 1304 (section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended).
The evidence adduced at the trial established that the immediate
Defendant conceded that the merchandise was properly marked in accordance with section 1304; and pursuant to Customs Court Eule 33 requested leave of the court not to file a brief, which request was granted.
Upon the facts and the applicable law in this case, the protests are sustained and no additional duties accrued upon the importation of the subject merchandise.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.