Daher Co. v. United States
Daher Co. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1021; 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1933
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of containers of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Fabius & Co., Inc., and Daher Company, Inc. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.