Durst Mfg. Co. v. United States
Durst Mfg. Co. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1030; 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1892
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), and that the strainers marked “A” are in chief value of brass and the strainers marked “B” are in chief value of zinc, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.