Fabius & Co. v. United States
Fabius & Co. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 1084; 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3320
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A”, covered by the foregoing protest, consist of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of synthetic rubber rimstrips in part of carbon, not dedicated to use with bicycles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.