Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint filed in this action, which is captioned “New York Merchandise Co., Inc., Plaintiff v. The United States, Defendant.”
I am satisfied from an examination of the official papers forwarded to the court that Nissho-Iwai is the record plaintiff in this appeal for reappraisement, and not New York Merchandise. It further appears that the attorneys of record for Nissiho-Iwai are Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, Esqs., while the complaint was filed on behalf of New York Merchandise by the law firm of Stein and Shostak, Esqs. Significantly, the certificate of service attached to defendant’s motion shows that the
An examination of the allegations of the complaint indicates that, possibly, the complaint bears the wrong court number and is addressed to another action. In such event, New York Merchandise has no interest or standing in the above-captioned action.
Inasmuch as Stein and Shostak are not the attorneys of record fox Nissho-Iwai, the plaintiff herein, it is apparent that counsel for the proper plaintiff have received no notice of defendant’s motion. Under all the circumstances, defendant’s motion is denied, but without prejudice to renewal, and by serving copies thereof both on Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, counsel for Nissho-Iwai, and on Stein and Shostak, counsel for New York Merchandise.
Defendant’s motion papers are similarly captioned.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.