Supreme Court of Dakota, 1889

Territory of Dakota v. Armstrong

Territory of Dakota v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Dakota · Decided May 15, 1889 · Templeton
6 Dakota 226

Counsel

Stack & Hoskins, for appellants., George H. Meguier and Bosard <& Gorliss, for respondent.

Territory of Dakota v. Armstrong

Opinion of the Court

By the Court :

The judgment in this case is affirmed, the court being of opinion, 1. That quo warrmito is a proper remedy.

2. That the action is properly brought under our statute in the name of the district attorney.

*2313. That the action is properly brought against the defendants without joinder of the alleged corporation.

4. That the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action.

All concur except Templeton, J., not sitting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.