Supreme Court of Dakota, 1889

Territory of Dakota v. Collins

Supreme Court of Dakota · Decided May 15, 1889 · Croeoot, Jby, Templeton, Voting

6 Dakota 234

Counsel

W. J. Hughes, J. H. Hill and T. D. O’Brien, for plaintiff in error., Johnson NieTcens, Attorney-General, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Pray (S.D. 1932)
State v. Holburn (S.D. 1909)
State v. Biggerstaff (Mont. 1896)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JBy the Court :

The judgment in this case is affirmed — the court holding that while the question asked the witness Anderson as to whether or not he was drunk, was proper cross-examination ; yet, there was no reversabl.e error, as he was permitted to answer the question in effect at another time.

The objectionable remarks of the attorney for the prosecution to the jury are not saved by the record so as to be reviewed by this court.

All concur, except Templeton, J., not sitting, and Croeoot, J., not voting.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.