In re Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
Before the Panel: Plaintiff in the District of Arizona action, listed on Schedule A,
On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that centralization under Section 1407 in the District of Arizona will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions—three of which are putative nationwide class actions—share factual issues concerning an incident in which the 2015 W-2 forms of Sprouts employees were released, unencrypted, to an unknown party as the result of a phishing scam. Centralization will eliminate duplica-tive discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings on class certification and other issues; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary.
We are persuaded that the District of Arizona is an appropriate transferee forum for this litigation. Sprouts is headquartered in this district, and the witnesses and documents relevant to the facts of this litigation are located there. Defendants and moving plaintiff support selection of this district.
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2731 — IN RE: SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, INC., EMPLOYEE DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
District of Arizona
PRICE v. SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET INCORPORATED, C.A. No. 2:16-02047
Central District of California
PORRAS, ET AL. v. SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 5:16-01005
Southern District of California
HERNANDEZ v. SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16-00958
CASTELLANO v. SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 3:16-01184
. Movant’s action originally was filed in the District of Colorado, but was later transferred to the District of Arizona under 28 U.S.C. § 1404. Movant subsequently filed an amended complaint, adding two additional plaintiffs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.