In re Needham Excavating, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Before the Panel: Needham Excavating, Inc. (NEI) moves under
On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing held, we conclude that centralization is not necessary for the convenience of the parties and witnesses or to further the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions share factual issues arising from a dispute concerning a 2018 fringe benefit audit of NEI. The audit allegedly found, inter alia , that NEI failed to properly report and remit approximately $ 400,000 in contributions to certain employee benefit funds. But there are only two actions, and the factual issues do not appear to be especially complex. In the Iowa action, NEI seeks a declaratory judgment that it is not obligated to pay the amount in question. In the Illinois action, the plaintiffs sue NEI for payment of that amount. In short, the litigation involves a fairly run-of-the-mill business dispute involving only a few parties in only two cases. See In re: Mansfield Oil Co. of Gainesville, Inc., Contract Litig. ,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for centralization of these actions is denied.
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2883 - IN RE: NEEDHAM EXCAVATING, INC., EMPLOYMENT RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION
Northern District of Illinois
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 150, AFL-CIO, ET AL. v. NEEDHAM EXCAVATING, INC., C.A. No. 1:18-08045
Southern District of Iowa
NEEDHAM EXCAVATING, INC. v. TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 150, ET AL., C.A. No. 3:18-00116
Plaintiffs are The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund; Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund; Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund; Local 150 IUOE Vacation Savings Plan; Midwest Operating Engineers Retirement Enhancement Fund; and Construction Industry Research and Service Trust Fund.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.