United States v. Soto
Opinion
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700192 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. CALEB C. SOTO Sonar Technician (Surface) Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander John T. Stephens, JAGC, USN.
Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Training Support Center, San Diego, CA.
Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Lieutenant M.W. Altman II, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________ Decided 21 September 2017 _________________________ Before M ARKS , W OODARD , and E LLINGTON , Appellate Military Judges _________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental court-martial order shall contain a summary of Charge I and its specification and note that they were withdrawn by the convening authority post-arraignment but before the entry of pleas.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.