United States v. Croyle
Opinion
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201800121 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ALEXANDER J. CROYLE Aviation Electronics Technician Airman (E -3), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Jason L. Jones, JAGC, USN.
Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL.
Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander George W.
Lucier, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________ Decided 30 July 2018 _________________________ Before W OODARD , H UTCHISON , and S TEPHENS , Appellate Military Judges _________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the military judge awarded the appellant 100 days of confinement credit for a violation of Article 13, UCMJ.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.