United States v. Francis
Opinion
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________
No. 201800178 _________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee v.
RYAN F. FRANCIS
Hospitalman (E-3), U.S. Navy
Appellant _________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander William H. Weiland, JAGC, U.S. Navy.
For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USNR.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________
Decided 30 August 2018 _________________________
Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and HINES, Appellate Military Judges _________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assign- ment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the con- vening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court-martial order shall reflect that the words “and a video” in Specification 1 of the Charge were withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice, to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review, and the appellant was found guilty of Specification 1 of the Charge.
FOR THE COURT
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.