United States v. Megeed
Opinion
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201800153 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. Ahmed A. MEGEED Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________ Decided 31 October 2018 _________________________ Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assign- ment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the con- vening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court-martial order shall reflect that the govern- ment withdrew Specifications 7 and 11 of Charge III and dismissed them without prejudice, to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review; thus the appellant was not found Not Guilty of those specifications.
Record at 109.
FOR THE COURT
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.