United States v. Ramos
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, HOUTZ, and PENNIX
Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES
Appellee v.
Alejandro E. RAMOS
Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000021
Decided: 27 October 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge:
Hayes C. Larsen
Sentence adjudged 26 September 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Ramos, NMCCA No. 202000021 Opinion of the Court _________________________ PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.