United States v. ROBERTSON

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Dnarius C. ROBERTSON Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 202000281 Decided: 18 October 2021 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Michael D. Zimmerman Sentence adjudged 23 October 2020 by a special court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, consisting of a mili- tary judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for four months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander E. L. Alexander, JAGC, USN For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

United States v. Robertson, NMCCA No. 202000281 Opinion of the Court _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________ PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 However, we note that the Statement of Trial Results [SOTR] incorrectly states that Appellant’s conviction is not a crime of domestic violence as defined in Dep’t of Def. Instr. 6400.06, Domestic Abuse Involving DoD Mili- tary and Certain Affiliated Personnel, encl. 2 (Ch. 4, May 26, 2017) [DoDI 6400.06] and does not trigger the prohibition against possessing a firearm in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 922. Appellant was convicted of child endanger- ment by culpable negligence resulting in harm, in violation of Article 119b, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 2 for shaking and squeezing the torso of his two-month-old son, resulting in three rib fractures, two clavicle fractures, and bilateral, subconjunctival hemorrhage of the eyes. This is a crime of domestic violence, which triggers the prohibition against firearm possession. 3 Accord- ingly, we order correction of the SOTR to reflect the same.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ] arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

2 10 U.S.C. § 919b.

3 See DoDI 6400.06, encl. 2 (defining the crime of domestic violence as “an offense that has as its factual basis, the use . . . of physical force . . . committed by a . . . parent . . . of the victim”); 18 U.S.C § 922(g)(9) (prohibiting firearm possession for a person convicted of a crime of domestic violence).