United States v. Hatcher
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before GASTON, MYERS, and BURGTORF Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Scholar B.J. HATCHER Hospitalman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202200049 Decided: 9 June 2022 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Rachel E. Trest Sentence adjudged 23 November 2021 by a special court-martial con- vened at Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 86 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Matthew A. Kozyra, JAGC, USN _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________ United States v. Hatcher, NMCCA No. 202200049 Opinion of the Court PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred.1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
KYLE D. MEEDER Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.